Lodge online

Register for online access

How to lodge

Download paper forms

Search all forms

Search ASIC registers

Within: 

Search financial services/credit licensees and representatives, liquidators, auditors and more

Professional registers

--------------------------------------------------

More information

Lodge online

decrease text size increase text size print page
AD 10-157 ASIC seeks to enforce undertaking

Monday 19 July 2010


ASIC has started proceedings in the NSW Supreme Court, seeking a declaration and orders against Empower Invest Pty Ltd and Newcastle Palais Holdings Pty Ltd (the companies) for breaches of an enforceable undertaking.

ASIC initially investigated allegations the companies, and their respective directors Kenneth Watson and Brien Cornwell (the directors) promoted and operated a managed investment scheme in relation to a property development at Hunter Street, Newcastle (the scheme) without registration and without holding an Australian financial services licence (AFSL).

The scheme raised $769,500 in total from ten investors. ASIC’s investigation revealed that offers had been made to a larger number of investors to join the scheme. ASIC took action to prevent the further promotion of the scheme.

On 9 May 2008, the court declared, with consent from the companies and the directors (jointly the defendants), that the defendants had operated an unregistered managed investment scheme and carried on a financial services business in relation to the scheme in breach of the Corporations Act 2001 (the Act). ASIC also accepted enforceable undertakings from the defendants in which they undertook to:
A copy of the undertaking is available on ASIC’s website.

While the defendants complied in part with their undertaking, they failed to repay investors as promised.

Under the powers given to ASIC, in particular section 93AA(3) of the ASIC Act, ASIC may seek an order from the court for a breach of an undertaking. In this case, ASIC has commenced proceedings against the companies to enforce the undertaking with a view to pursuing an appropriate avenue of compensation for the unpaid investors in the scheme.

The matter is expected back before the NSW Supreme Court on 22 July 2010.

decrease text size increase text size print page