ASIC media releases are point-in-time statements. Please note the date of issue and use the internal search function on the site to check for other media releases on the same or related matters.
16-078MR ASIC commences proceedings in connection with the spike in securities prices on ASX on 18 October 2012
ASIC has commenced proceedings in the Federal Court of Australia in Sydney against Whitebox Trading Pty Limited and its sole director and principal, Johannes Boshoff, following an investigation into the spike on 18 October 2012 in the prices of securities comprised in the S&P/ASX 200 Index (Index Securities).
ASIC alleges, among other market misconduct, that it was likely artificial prices for trading Index Securities would be created by order activities of Mr Boshoff and Whitebox on 18 October 2012, as well as on 4 earlier dates in 2012.
ASIC also alleges that false or misleading appearances as to market for Index Securities were created by orders that Mr Boshoff and Whitebox had placed on the ASX but did not intend to trade.
ASIC is seeking:
- declarations that Mr Boshoff and Whitebox contravened provisions of the Corporations Act
- orders that they pay penalties to the Commonwealth, and
- that they be restrained from providing financial services for a defined period.
Whitebox had been contracted to provide index arbitrage trading software and services to National Australia Bank Limited and the relevant order activities were conducted by Whitebox's trading personnel, including Mr Boshoff, while providing those services.
On 23 December 2013, ASIC accepted an enforceable undertaking (EU) from NAB in relation to its responsibility for the alleged market misconduct of Whitebox's trading personnel.
Links to the originating process filed by ASIC to commence its proceeding and to the EU are below.
Editor's Note 1:
On 14 April 2016, the Federal Court of Australia made case management orders in the matter, including orders for the filing and service of evidence, and ordered that the matter return to court on 3 August 2016 for further directions.
Editor's note 2:
The directions hearing scheduled for 3 August 2016 was deferred by consent and without appearance to 2 September 2016 and then, subsequently, at the request of the court, further deferred to 15 September 2016.
Editor's note 3:
At the request of the court, the case management hearing scheduled for 15 September 2016 was further deferred to 23 September 2016.
Editor's note 4:
On 23 September 2016, the matter was stood over to 3 March 2017, for a further case management hearing.
Editor's note 5:
On 3 February 2017, the case management hearing scheduled for 3 March 2017 was deferred by consent to 8 March 2017.